Market Risks that Are Creating Societal Risks (w/ Danielle DiMartino-Booth & Chris Cole)

DANIELLE DIMARTINO BOOTH: Speaking of systemic,
let’s end this– I could talk to you for hours, by the way. This is just fascinating. But let’s wrap this up today with where you
conclude this wonderful paper. Richard Fisher and I met years ago when I
was still inside the Fed. We had lunch there were riots in the streets
of Athens at the time. And I said, I said, Richard, what do you make
of this? What can we draw from this? I’d been writing about pensions for 20 years. And he said, Danielle, I fear that we’ll have
those riots in our streets one day, that the public pensioners and the people who are paying
for the public pensioners– if you’re Joe Q with an IRA or 401(k), and you lose most
of the value of your equity holdings, and you’re told that your property taxes or your
income tax, state income taxes are going to have to go up to top off the pension that’s
just lost as much– you talk about these things in public forums, and individuals go at each
other. Talk about the societal implications of where
we are today what you see potentially happening, because you used the word systemic. CHRISTOPHER COLE: So the way that the average
institutional entitlement portfolio is structured today- – and this is not an opinion. I’m looking back across history. There is a recency bias. This is constructed for the last 40 years
of unprecedented asset price growth. But if you look beyond that 40 years and look
at how that portfolio will perform, at a best case, you’re looking at a 5% type of return. In a worst case, given where debt levels are
and where leverage is, you’re looking at something much, much worse. So if we just assume the best case, it makes
5% or 4% over the next 20 years, these entitlement programs. DANIELLE DIMARTINO BOOTH: Which is not enough. CHRISTOPHER COLE: Not enough, because they’re
targeting 7.25%. That will cause an expansion of the unfunded
liabilities in just the state systems alone to about $3 trillion. If we end up getting a lost decade, that could
go as high as $10 trillion. That $3 trillion number, that is the cost
of four bank bailouts. It is the entire tax revenue of the US government
over the next year. That is your base case. These entitlement programs, which right now,
based on the 7.25% assumption, will go from 70% funded to under 50% funded, and a third
of them will be under 30% funded. And this is not including corporate programs
and other personal retirement programs. This issue of asset allocation is an issue
of systemic risk. It is an issue of social stability, because
we will be at a point where these entitlement programs will go belly-up and face insolvency
unless we can think differently about the portfolio construction. I could see a lot of different things happening. I could see a day where the Fed prints money
to buy pension obligation bonds. DANIELLE DIMARTINO BOOTH: Chris, if I can
tell you something, during the crisis, when I was inside the Fed, it was debated. CHRISTOPHER COLE: Wow. That’s amazing. DANIELLE DIMARTINO BOOTH: The idea– if you
tech logic to the end game, the idea of the Fed buying municipal bonds is perfectly feasible. CHRISTOPHER COLE: That’s right. And that will be a backdoor bailout of Wall
Street if that happens. You could see a radical progressive dynamic,
where we shift to seize capital, and where there’s– it causes massive inflation. There’s numerous ways. But the question at the end of the day is
the average portfolio is only attenuated to this last 40 year period of growth. It’s not about being afraid. It’s about being prepared. So my parents, during the great financial
crisis, they came out ahead because they had allocations to volatility in gold, and that
saved them and allowed them to retire on time. I think the institutions, the large institutions
and the average investors, if they can find ways to invest large portions in countertrend
assets, not only will they get a better overall return profile and more safe return profile,
but this will be a way for these institutions to be able to prosper during a period of secular
change, rather than suffer. So I think this is a major– it is more than
a financial issue. It’s a social issue. That these defensive assets, they’re not for
a rainy day. They’re for a rainy decade. The problem that we face is not a problem
of financial management or economics. It’s a problem– it’s a social problem. It’s an emotional problem. It takes a lot of social discipline and to
think differently. Many of our leaders would rather fail conventionally
with the herd than succeed unconventionally. DANIELLE DIMARTINO BOOTH: They’re not Genghis
Khan. CHRISTOPHER COLE: That’s right. That’s absolutely right. DANIELLE DIMARTINO BOOTH: It was great talking
to you today. Thank you so much– CHRISTOPHER COLE: Thank
you. DANIELLE DIMARTINO BOOTH: –for being with
Real Vision. CHRISTOPHER COLE: I had a great time.


  1. Become a Real Vision member today! Try it for only $1 for 30 days here:

    Not only will you get early access to the newest episodes of The Interview, but you can also get access to our other original series such The Expert View and Investment Ideas, get fresh content daily, and download it all to watch anytime, anywhere–and you can get all of these perks and more, ad-free. So what are you waiting for? Join now! 🙌

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *